Like, P
Coyne, J.C., and you may D.A great. Smith. 1994. Lovers living with myocardial infarction: Contextual angle into the patient mind-efficacy. Log away from Relatives Mindset 8:1-thirteen.
Fincham, F.D., T.Letter. Bradbury, and you will C.K. Scott. 1990. Cognition within the and you can T. Letter. Bradbury, eds. The new mindset of relationships. Ny: Guilford Force.
Gottman, J.M. 1993. Brand new spots out-of disagreement engagement, https://datingranking.net/cs/teenchat-recenze/ escalation, and cures in marital interaction: A longitudinal look at four sorts of couples. Record regarding Contacting and Systematic Therapy 61(1):6-fifteen.
Gottman, J.Yards., S. Carrere, C. Swanson and you can J. Coan. 2000. React to “Out of preliminary research so you’re able to intervention.” Record regarding ily 62(1):265-273.
Gottman, J.M., J. Coan, S. Carrere, and C. Swanson. 1998. Anticipating marital contentment and you may balances out of newlywed interactions. Log from ily 60(1):5-twenty two.
Holtzworth-Munroe, An effective., and you can N. S. Jacobson. 1985. Causal attributions out-of maried people: Whenever carry out it try to find grounds? What exactly do it stop when they manage? Diary from Identity and you may Public Therapy -1412.
Kendall, S., and D. Tannen. 2001. Commentary and Gender. Inside D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and you will H. Hamilton, eds. The new Handbook of Commentary Analysis. 548-567. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Writers.
Lerner, H. 2002. New dancing out of union: Just how to keep in touch with anyone when you are mad, hurt, terrified, frustrated, insulted, betrayed or eager. New york: HarperCollins Editors.
Stanley, S., T. Bradbury, and you can H. . Architectural defects throughout the bridge regarding basic research towards wedding to help you intervention to own lovers. Journal off ily 62(1):256-264.
Cite this particular article
Wiley, Angela Roentgen. 2007. Hooking up as one or two: Interaction feel to have suit relationship. The brand new Message board to have Members of the family and you can Consumer Things, several (1).
A great interaction and situation-fixing enjoy was critical for dating victory; not, suit relationships require way more than simply a good interaction and you can situation-solving experiences. There is certainly a common more than-reliance upon these types of since the “royal path to love and an enduring, happier relationships”(Gottman and you can Gold 1999, 8). These knowledge are essential not adequate for strong relationship and can be contextualized included in the large few system. (Having information regarding other trick strategies so you can building and you will keeping a beneficial suit matchmaking, understand the National Extension Matchmaking and Relationship Training Model,
Within her book, The new Dance of Partnership, specialist Harriet Lerner (2002) talks about which have a genuine voice in the essential sexual relationships. She argues that an essential part of getting an actual sound is “openly shar[ing] proficiency in addition to trouble and you will susceptability (Lerner 2002, 3). Their a lot of time-identity logical practice implies that it really is intimate interaction involves partners fully paying attention to each other and asking making clear concerns that enable them to understand both further. Effortlessly sexual partners are also in a position state their unique emotions and you may opinion, even in the event men and women range from their partner’s.
Bad perceptions. Negative translation activities will are present when partners faith the fresh worst alternatively of the finest about one another (Fincham, Bradbury, and you may Scott, 1990; Holtzworth-Munroe and you may Jacobson 1985). Eg people are perhaps not “keeping they confident.” They may practice a harsh initiate-up bid according to a negative translation or assumption. They might turn against or away from its lover whenever responding in order to a bid. Partners that happen to be very likely to bad interpretations you are going to as an alternative was funny a confident factor in new other people’s habits and sharing all of them with their lover. For example, in the place of, “You probably did maybe not remove the brand new garbage since you should make myself crazy,” Jim you will tell his partner, Peg, “I am sure you don’t take-out new garbage as you thought I would have more to increase the latest normally.”
Coan, J., J. Gottman, J. Babcock, and you may Letter. Jacobson. 1997. Battering plus the male rejection away from infiuence of lady. Aggressive Choices -388.